SC strikes down Electoral Bonds scheme as Unconstitutional

Calling it violative of right to information and freedom of speech under Constitution


Apex Court directs bank to stop issuance of anonymous poll Bonds, orders SBI to to provide the details of donations and the information about the parties that received these contributions to the ECI


The scheme allows individuals -- who are citizens of India -- and domestic companies to donate these bonds — issued in multiples of Rs 1,000, Rs 10,000, Rs 1 lakh, Rs 10 lakh, and Rs 1 crore — to political parties of their choice

Manoj Kumar Pathak

New Delhi : In a landmark judgement, the Supreme Court on Thursday annulled the electoral bonds scheme for anonymous political funding, saying it violates the constitutional right to freedom of speech and expression as well as the right to information. The Apex Court pronounced its verdict on a batch of petitions challenging the validity of the Electoral Bond scheme, which allows for anonymous funding to political parties. A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud delivered two separate but unanimous verdicts on pleas challenging the scheme.


Supreme Court holds that anonymous Electoral Bonds scheme is violative of Right to Information under Article 19(1)(a). SC says infringement to the Right to Information is not justified for the purpose of curbing black money. In its ruling, the court emphasized the significance of political parties in the electoral process, highlighting that transparency regarding their funding is crucial for informed electoral decisions.


The court concluded that undisclosed contributions to political parties violate the right to information and Article 19(1)(a) of the constitution.
It was noted that donations to political entities in exchange for favorable policies can result in a quid pro quo arrangement. Furthermore, the court clarified that the right to privacy regarding political affiliation does not extend to contributions aimed at influencing public policy, applying solely to contributions below a certain threshold. The amendments to the Income Tax Act provision and Section 29C of the Representation of Peoples Act were deemed ultra vires by the court.


The Constitution Bench of Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud, and comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, JB Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra, delivered the verdict. The Association for Democratic Reforms, the Communist Party of India (Marxist), Dr. Jaya Thakur, and Spandan Biswal had challenged the Electoral Bond Scheme in the Court. The Court ordered ECI to publish donation details by March 13.

The Court has instructed the banks issuing electoral bonds to cease the process. The State Bank of India (SBI), which was authorized by the Centre to sell the bonds, has been directed by the top court to provide the details of donations made through electoral bonds and the information about the political parties that received these contributions to the Election Commission of India (ECI). SBI shall submit these details to the ECI. The ECI shall then publish this information on its website by March 13, 2014.

Key Highlights of the Judgment

SC strikes down electoral bonds scheme: The top court struck down the electoral bonds scheme calling it unconstitutional.
-

Not the only means to curb black money in electoral financing: The Supreme Court said infringement to the Right to Information is not justified for the purpose of curbing black money. “There are other alternatives which substantially fulfil the purpose and impact the right to information minimally when compared to the impact of electoral bonds on the right to information," SC said.
-

Electoral bond scheme violative of freedom of speech and expression: Pronouncing the verdict, the CJI said the scheme is violative of freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of Constitution. The bench said the fundamental right to privacy includes citizens’ right to political privacy and affiliation.

Advantage for party in power: The Constitution bench held that the Electoral Bonds scheme will help the party in power to gain an advantage. "There is also a legitimate possibility that financial contributions to a political party would lead to a quid pro quo arrangement because of the close nexus between money and politics, SC said.


SBI ordered to stop issuing Electoral bonds immediately: SC ordered the State Bank of India (SBI) to stop issuing Electoral Bonds immediately. The top court asked the SBI to furnish details of the political parties that received Electoral Bonds since April 12, 2019, and all the particulars received and submit them to the Election Commission of India by March 6. The details that the SBI will furnish will disclose details of each electoral bond encashed by the political parties, which shall include the date of encashment and the denomination of the electoral bond. The apex court said that by March 13, the ECI shall publish the details of Electoral Bonds on its official website.


What is Electoral Bond Scheme:


An electoral bond is a financial instrument introduced in India in 2018 for donating money to political parties. It's purchased from specified State Bank of India (SBI) branches, providing anonymity to donors. Critics raise concerns about transparency and influence on political parties. The first batch of electoral bonds were sold between March 1-10, 2018 at designated branches of State Bank of India. The scheme allows individuals -- who are citizens of India -- and domestic companies to donate these bonds — issued in multiples of Rs 1,000, Rs 10,000, Rs 1 lakh, Rs 10 lakh, and Rs 1 crore — to political parties of their choice. Only the political parties registered under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and which secured not less than 1 per cent of the votes polled in the last elections to the Lok Sabha or a state legislative assembly are eligible to receive electoral bonds.

Renu’s Dhanjal:  Patna, Still Drowning

Patna’s recurring floods echo Phanishwar Nath Renu’s 1975 reportage. Fifty years later, the crisis exposes urban planning failures, drainage gaps and lost lessons.

Niraj Krishna   |  1 day, 7 hours ago

The Price of Profit in Satya Niketan, South Delhi

The Satya Niketan tragedy is not simply a story of one negligent landlord. It raises serious questions about unregulated construction, overcrowded student housing and the failure of civic enforcement in South Delhi.

Dinesh Dubey @ Editorial   |  1 day, 10 hours ago

The Rise of Rogue AI Agents and the Global Rush for Liability Laws

Rogue AI agents are raising new cybersecurity and accountability risks. Why governments need binding liability laws for autonomous AI systems.

Dinesh Dubey @ Editorial   |  1 day, 22 hours ago

NEPAL IN THE GRIP OF WORST FLASH FLOOD DISASTER

Nepal faces a devastating flash flood disaster linked to glacial ice and debris, with hundreds dead, thousands missing and major infrastructure badly damaged.

Alok K.Shrivastava   |  1 day, 22 hours ago

India’s Cities Are Growing Faster Than Their Infrastructure

India’s rapid urbanisation is outpacing infrastructure, governance and planning. Why cities need better housing, mobility, water management and climate resilience.

Ankita Mishra   |  1 day, 22 hours ago

Article 142:  Who Bowed—Power or Democracy?

The withdrawal of protest-related FIRs raises deeper questions about Article 142, public pressure, judicial power, institutional autonomy and the Rule of Law in India.

Niraj Krishna   |  2 days, 19 hours ago

Comments

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

View More

By Niraj Krishna   |   1 day, 7 hours ago
Renu’s Dhanjal:  Patna, Still Drowning
By Alok K.Shrivastava   |   1 day, 22 hours ago
NEPAL IN THE GRIP OF WORST FLASH FLOOD DISASTER
By Ankita Mishra   |   1 day, 22 hours ago
India’s Cities Are Growing Faster Than Their Infrastructure
By Niraj Krishna   |   2 days, 19 hours ago
Article 142:  Who Bowed—Power or Democracy?