Controversial Special Revision Campaign of Election Commission

 

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has initiated a "Special Intensive Revision (SIR)" of electoral rolls in Bihar, just months before the upcoming assembly elections, sparking widespread controversy. Opposition parties and civil society groups are raising concerns about the timing of this intensive revision, arguing that undertaking such a massive exercise so close to elections could disrupt free and fair polls. The last intensive revision in Bihar was conducted in 2003.

 

Critics, including the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), various opposition parties (Congress, RJD, TMC, DMK, SP, JMM, Left), and several independent political activists allege that the stringent documentation requirements and the short timeline for the SIR could lead to the disenfranchisement of millions of genuine voters, particularly from marginalized communities (SC, STs, migrant workers, the poor). Estimates suggest over a crore voters could be affected.

 

The SIR process requires voters to submit new forms and, in many cases, provide documents to prove citizenship and even citizenship of their parents. The exclusion of commonly accepted identity documents like Aadhar and ration cards from the list of accepted proofs has been heavily criticized, as many poor and rural voters may not possess the stipulated documents. This has shifted the onus of proving eligibility from the state to the citizens.

 

Opposition parties point out that a Special Summary Revision was already completed in Bihar between October 2024 and January 2025, raising questions about the necessity of another sweeping revision. The ECI maintains that the SIR is legally mandated and essential to ensure "electoral integrity," citing reasons like rapid urbanization, migration, young citizens becoming eligible, and non-reporting of deaths. They claim the process is progressing smoothly and that officials can also rely on field inquiries for inclusion of names. The ECI has also clarified that voters can submit documents even after initial forms, during the "claims and objections" period.

 

Multiple petitions have been filed in the Supreme Court challenging the validity of the SIR order, arguing that it violates constitutional provisions and fundamental rights. Petitioners include ADR, PUCL, Yogendra Yadav, and TMC MP Mahua Moitra. In essence, the controversy revolves around the potential for mass disenfranchisement due to the timing, strict documentation requirements, and perceived lack of transparency in the ECI's Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. All said and done the massive disenfranchisement tends to hurt the opposition vote bank but will also affect sections of pro-government rural and urban middle classes.

The Aravallis: Forests Beyond Semantics

The question of what constitutes a forest has once again become a matter of heated debate...

Manoj K. Pathak   |  1 week, 2 days ago

Put US-India relations back on track to counter China: Republican leader Nick Haley

New Delhi—Republican leader of Indian origin Nick Haley has advised Trump Administration that the US' priority...

Dr Satish Misra   |  1 week, 2 days ago

What the New U.S. “good moral character” Test Means: History, Global Context, and the Debate Ahead!

Calling U.S. citizenship a “gold standard” to be “reserved for the world’s best of the best,” ...

Dr. K. Ranjan Sharma   |  1 week, 2 days ago

Shibu Soren: Tribal Identity and the Debate on Bharat Ratna

The Bharat Ratna is not merely a decoration or an award; it is the nation’s highest recognition of an individual ....

Devendra Kumar Nayan   |  1 week, 2 days ago

The Proposed 130th Constitutional Amendment: Clash with India’s Democratic Foundations

The political and legal firestorm unleashed on August 20, 2025, in the Lok Sabha ...

Hasnain Naqvi   |  1 week, 2 days ago

Pot Calling the Kettle Black

Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has strongly rejected claims made by Bangladesh's interim government that members of the ousted Awami League are engaging in "anti-Bangladesh" activities from Indian soil. In an official statement, the MEA called, and rightly so, the allegations "misplaced."

Dinesh Dubey   |  1 week, 3 days ago

Comments

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

View More

By Manoj K. Pathak   |   1 week, 2 days ago
The Aravallis: Forests Beyond Semantics
By Devendra Kumar Nayan   |   1 week, 2 days ago
Shibu Soren: Tribal Identity and the Debate on Bharat Ratna