Friday, October 11, 2024
Home Blog Page 2

Personality Cult is Dangerous in Democracy

By
admin
-
0

Personality worship, or excessive adoration of a political leader, has frequently proven disastrous, particularly in democratic regimes where power is theoretically delegated to the people. This effect elevates leaders to nearly legendary status, above reproach and beyond criticism

Niraj Krishna

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar warned in a 1933 lecture in Mumbai, “If you do not nip the idea of idolizing an average individual by bestowing divinity upon him, it will destroy you. As a result, you build a pattern of dependence. This causes you to lose interest in your responsibilities. If you succumb to such views, your future in the national stream will be no better than that of a log of wood. Your efforts will be fruitless.”

Personality worship, or excessive adoration of a political leader, has frequently proven disastrous, particularly in democratic regimes where power is theoretically delegated to the people. This effect elevates leaders to nearly legendary status, above reproach and beyond criticism. When leaders are raised to such positions, it undermines democracy’s foundation, which is based on checks, balances, and accountability.

In a democracy, the common man is supreme. In recent years, there has been an increase in individual worship inside Indian democracy. Regardless of which party has been in power, personality worship has persisted. This cannot be considered a healthy sign because it merely fosters flattery. It is commonly said, “Keep a critic close by,” implying that anyone in power should always be surrounded by those who are willing to critique.

Today, however, we are witnessing the exact opposite. Anyone who obtains any kind of power is unable to endure criticism. If someone, whether a companion or an ordinary person, expresses a true but unpleasant judgment about them, they go to considerable measures to embarrass and harass that individual. In doing so, they cross all boundaries. When these individuals get more substantial positions of power, they begin to exploit every government agency to teach such people a lesson. While this may boost their ego, it also blocks the door to their own development. When someone who offers legitimate criticism is treated this way, others are discouraged from doing the same and instead prefer to agree with whatever the leader says.

The country has been designated a democracy since its independence on August 15, 1947, and the implementation of the Constitution on January 26, 1950. People’s ideas, however, could not alter as swiftly after over 200 years of British control, because independence was still new. since of this colonial attitude, people did not speak out against the system since they were being misled. The poor were uninformed of their rights, while the wealthy and capitalists put pressure on the government. Capitalists did not oppose the government since their interests were satisfied.

Since then, several changes have occurred, and the public has become more aware of their rights. However, the situation is not much better today than it was previously.

Excessive concentration of power in one person undermines democratic checks and balances. Legislative bodies may be reduced to rubber stamps for approval or disapproval, loyalists may be nominated to the judiciary, and the media may be compelled to echo rather than examine the leader’s narrative. As a result, the debate, dissent, and diversity of thought required for democracy to work properly are decreased. Without these measures, the system tends toward authoritarianism, which has major ramifications for human rights, freedom of expression, and governanc

Leaders that encourage personality worship frequently do so by projecting an image of nationalism, populism, or “man of the people.” Through speeches, television appearances, and social media, they promote themselves as saviors capable of rescuing the country from crisis. However, this image is typically accompanied by hostility toward institutions, experts, and democratic processes that may limit their authority.

One of the fundamental risks of personality worship is a lack of accountability. A venerated leader begins to act without fear of repercussions, confident that any misbehavior will be forgiven or excused by their followers. This lack of accountability promotes corruption, ineptitude, and misuse of power.

Personality worship can polarize citizens, dividing them into ardent fans and opponents. This polarization can lead to political violence because supporters are frequently encouraged to suppress opponents, whether overtly or covertly. Those who disagree with or criticize the leader are classified as state foes or traitors.


Today’s politicians do not rise to prominence by articulating a big vision or leading huge movements. Instead, they gain power by using narrow populist slogans and peddling false dreams. They create their foundation and establish legitimacy without being influenced by principles, ideals, or humanity. This class of politicians even entraps the educated masses in their lies, cruelty, and political frenzy, using people’s ability to reason.

When democratic institutions like the court, media, and legislature deteriorate, there is no effective check on the leader’s power. The leader gains more control, frequently manipulating laws, altering constitutions, and even utilizing state resources to maintain power. In the absence of accountability, policies are developed not for the good of the country, but to reinforce the leader’s grip on authority.


In such a setting, alternative voices are muffled, civil freedoms are restricted, and the free press is suppressed. This fosters a climate of fear and repression, making it more difficult for citizens to question governance. As the leader’s power grows unrestrained, democratic norms deteriorate, and the country deviates from its basic goals.

In daily life, the public is frequently marginalized. Promises made during campaigns fade into distant echoes, and political officials grow increasingly inaccessible. In such circumstances, even after being declared sovereign, people’s voices are drowned out by political maneuvering. Citizens in this atmosphere are reduced to pawns in a power game. When the average person believes that their participation has no substantial impact, the legitimacy of the entire democratic system is called into doubt.

Leaders in a healthy democracy are accountable to the people, and power is distributed across many branches to prevent any one individual from amassing too much influence. However, when personality cults take over, this equilibrium is broken. Leaders become identified with the nation, blurring the distinction between state and individual. This enables them to circumvent established democratic norms, often with the silent approval of their followers, who regard criticism of the leader as an attack on the state or the public.

The idea that “the people are the true rulers” is a fundamental principle of democratic governance. Democracy, at its foundation, is intended to empower citizens, guarantee their views are heard, preserve their rights, and meet their needs. This concept is based on the belief that each human has intrinsic value and deserves dignity, respect, and opportunity. However, the transition from principle to practice frequently yields a sharp contradiction.

In a democratic society, the people have ultimate authority, and it is their job to hold their leaders accountable. When citizens freely engage in personality worship, they abdicate their responsibility and risk losing their political autonomy. The danger of personality worship stems from its potential to manipulate public emotions, encouraging blind loyalty to individuals rather than fidelity to democratic principles.


When citizens fail to question or oppose their leaders, they allow abuse of power to continue unchecked. It becomes simpler for leaders to undermine democratic procedures, sending the country down a dangerous path. Healthy skepticism and critical thinking are vital tools for a democracy to flourish.

Personality worship is fundamentally opposed to the principles of political democracy. Democratic societies must favor institutions above people to keep power decentralized and accountable. Personality worship can have disastrous repercussions when it undermines structures established to protect liberty and responsibility. History has demonstrated that when democratic institutions fail and one leader is given unrestrained power, the consequences can be terrible.

Currently, democracy is being abused and turned into mob rule. At the time of independence, our nation-builders and constitution-makers envisioned a deliberative democracy in which decisions were made by consensus, every issue was positively discussed, efforts were made to convert discussions into consensus, and that consensus was faithfully implemented. Mahatma Gandhi also stated that whenever you make a decision, consider the influence it will have on the last person.

Leaders and public alike must guard against the hazardous seduction of personality worship. Leaders must follow democratic principles, and citizens must remain watchful, questioning and holding those in authority accountable. Only by doing so can democracy thrive, guaranteeing that power is retained in the hands of the people rather than any single individual.

Niraj Krishna

Understanding ‘One Nation, One Election’: A New Era for Indian Polls

By
admin
-
0

Ravindra Ojha

The Union Cabinet, has officially approved the ‘One Nation, One Election’ (ONOE) report, a transformative concept aiming to conduct simultaneous elections for both the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies across India. This proposal, which seeks to revolutionize the electoral process, promises significant cost savings, improved efficiency, and potentially increased voter turnout. However, its implementation is not without substantial constitutional and logistical hurdles.

  • What Is ‘One Nation, One Election’?

The ONOE concept centers on the idea of synchronizing elections for the Lok Sabha and state assemblies throughout the country. Currently, elections are held independently, either at the end of a five-year term or following the dissolution of assemblies for various reasons. This independent scheduling often leads to overlapping campaigns, heightened costs, and a continuous political atmosphere that can be overwhelming for both voters and candidates.

  • The Rationale Behind ONOE :

The rationale for ONOE is deeply rooted in the desire to enhance the efficiency of the electoral process in India, the world’s largest democracy. The Indian electoral landscape is marked by frequent elections at various levels, creating a scenario where political parties and candidates are often in campaign mode rather than focusing on governance. Proponents argue that synchronizing elections will not only reduce electoral fatigue among voters but also lead to better governance.

  • Historical Context :

The concept of simultaneous elections is not novel. It traces its roots back to India’s first general elections in 1951-52, when Lok Sabha elections coincided with state assembly polls. This practice continued until 1967, disrupted by a series of hung assemblies and early dissolutions of the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. The subsequent years have witnessed a fragmented electoral calendar, with elections taking place at staggered intervals.

  • Past Attempts and Recommendations :

Efforts to revive the idea of simultaneous elections have been made over the years. The Election Commission of India has consistently advocated for ONOE, articulating its stance in various discussions and reports. Notably, both the 107th report of the Law Commission in 1999 and the 22nd Law Commission’s recommendations in 2018 have called for restoring simultaneous elections, emphasizing the need for a more coherent electoral framework.

  • Current Election Landscape:

Currently, elections for the Lok Sabha and state assemblies can occur at different times, sometimes leading to confusion among voters. In the past decade, the frequency of elections has increased, with multiple states holding elections within months of each other. This fragmentation strains administrative resources and places an excessive burden on the Election Commission, which must manage multiple election cycles in quick succession.

  • Benefits of Simultaneous Elections:

Supporters of ONOE argue that conducting joint elections could yield several benefits:

Cost Savings

One of the most compelling arguments for ONOE is the potential for significant cost savings. According to estimates, approximately ₹60,000 crore was spent during the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, covering expenses incurred by political parties and the Election Commission of India in managing the polls. By conducting elections simultaneously, these costs could be dramatically reduced.

Administrative Efficiency

The administrative machinery of the state is heavily taxed during elections. The requirement for security personnel, polling staff, and logistical arrangements diverts resources away from regular governance. A simultaneous election would streamline these processes, allowing for better resource allocation and management.

Higher Voter Turnout

There is also a belief that simultaneous elections could lead to higher voter turnout. When elections are held frequently, voter fatigue can set in, potentially discouraging participation. A unified election cycle may energize voters and encourage them to engage more actively in the democratic process.

Reduced Political Campaigning Strain

Frequent elections keep political parties in a constant state of campaign mode, which can detract from their ability to focus on governance. By consolidating election dates, parties can concentrate their efforts on addressing citizens’ concerns rather than perpetually preparing for the next election.

Stability and Governance

Proponents argue that ONOE could lead to greater political stability and improved governance. With less frequent elections, governments would have more time to implement policies and initiatives without the constant interruption of electoral cycles. This stability could create a more conducive environment for economic growth and development.

Improved Focus on Local Issues

Simultaneous elections could allow for a more integrated approach to governance, where local and national issues are addressed cohesively. Currently, local elections can become overshadowed by national issues, leading to a disconnect between state governments and their constituents. ONOE could help bridge this gap, ensuring that local concerns are adequately represented.

  • Challenges in Implementing Simultaneous Elections

Despite the potential benefits, the ONOE proposal faces numerous challenges that complicate its implementation:

Constitutional Amendments

Implementing ONOE will require significant constitutional amendments. Key articles, including 83 (Duration of Houses), 85(2)(B) (Sessions of Parliament), and 174(2)(B) (Duration of State Legislatures), will need to be revised. Additionally, amendments to the Representation of the People Act, 1951, are essential for synchronizing the election schedules.

Legislative Hurdles

To effect these changes, the government will need a two-thirds majority in Parliament. Given the current political climate, achieving such consensus may prove difficult. Moreover, ratification from at least half of the states is necessary, adding another layer of complexity to the process.

Political Opposition

Opposition to ONOE has emerged from various political parties, which raise concerns about the potential for increased centralization of power and the diminishing of local political dynamics. Critics argue that a focus on national issues may overshadow regional concerns, leading to an imbalance in representation.

Concerns About Democratic Principles

Critics of ONOE argue that it may undermine the democratic fabric of the country. They fear that centralizing election schedules could lead to an imbalance where national parties exert undue influence over regional parties and local issues. This concern is particularly relevant in a diverse nation like India, where regional parties often play a crucial role in governance.

Logistical Challenges

Implementing simultaneous elections poses logistical challenges, including ensuring adequate availability of electronic voting machines (EVMs), polling staff, and security personnel. The sheer scale of conducting elections across 28 states and 8 Union Territories requires meticulous planning and coordination.

Voter Education and Awareness

Educating the electorate about the new system will be crucial for its success. Voter awareness campaigns will need to be ramped up to ensure that citizens understand the implications of simultaneous elections and how it affects their participation in the democratic process.

Potential Legal Challenges

The proposed amendments may face legal scrutiny, leading to court challenges that could delay implementation. Legal experts warn that the changes required to facilitate ONOE must be carefully crafted to withstand judicial review, ensuring they align with the fundamental principles of democracy.

  • Perspectives: For and Against Simultaneous Polls

Supporters’ Viewpoint

Supporters of ONOE advocate for the benefits of reduced costs, enhanced efficiency, and greater political stability. They argue that the current election system is unsustainable and that synchronizing elections will allow governments to focus more effectively on governance.

Critics’ Concerns

Opponents of the proposal express concerns about its potential impact on democracy. They fear that ONOE could lead to an erosion of local representation and amplify the influence of national parties at the expense of regional voices. The democratic spirit of allowing voters to choose their representatives at staggered intervals is a crucial element of India’s political landscape.

The Middle Ground

Some political analysts suggest a middle ground, proposing a phased approach to implementing ONOE. This could involve synchronizing elections for certain states or levels of government as a pilot project, allowing for adjustments based on feedback and outcomes before a full-scale rollout.

The ‘One Nation, One Election’ proposal holds the potential to reshape the electoral landscape in India. While its advocates argue that it could lead to significant efficiencies and improvements in governance, the proposal also invites intense debate about its feasibility and impact on democratic processes.

As discussions unfold, the success of ONOE will depend on navigating its constitutional challenges, addressing concerns from various stakeholders, and ensuring broad political consensus. The complexity of India’s electoral system requires careful consideration of both the benefits and risks associated with this ambitious initiative.

In a nation as diverse as India, the challenge lies not only in the logistics of implementation but also in preserving the democratic principles that form the bedrock of its political system. Balancing efficiency with representation, and national priorities with local concerns, will be critical as India contemplates this new chapter in its electoral journey.

One Nation, One Election Proposal Cleared by Modi’s Cabinet Amidst Opposition

By
admin
-
0

  • Cabinet nod to Ram Nath Kovind-led panel report on One Nation One Election
  • Step closer to simultaneous polls for Lok Sabha and state Assemblies
  • Bill in the upcoming winter session of Parliament likely

Manoj Kumar Pathak

New Delhi : In a significant political move, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Cabinet approved the “One Nation, One Election” (ONOP) proposal on Wednesday, advocating for simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. The proposal, which also includes holding urban body and panchayat elections within 100 days, is based on recommendations from a high-profile panel led by former President Ram Nath Kovind.

The government argues that ONOP will streamline the electoral process, reduce costs, and minimize logistical challenges in organizing elections across the vast landscape of India. A bill related to this proposal is set to be introduced in the upcoming Winter Session of Parliament, where it must pass through both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. Importantly, the proposal requires a constitutional amendment, necessitating ratification from all states and union territories.

The panel’s report touts various advantages of ONOP, including enhanced voter convenience, accelerated economic growth, and a stable business environment. It asserts that simultaneous elections would reduce disruptions caused by migrant workers seeking time off to vote, thereby maintaining supply chain integrity and production cycles. Furthermore, proponents claim that ONOP could help mitigate “policy paralysis” and the uncertainties associated with frequent elections.

Prime Minister Modi has previously advocated for the proposal, highlighting the need for a more efficient electoral framework during his Independence Day address. However, the approval of the ONOP has ignited a fierce backlash from the opposition, signaling a potentially tumultuous Winter Session.

Fifteen political parties, including the Congress, have voiced strong opposition to the ONOP initiative. Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge labeled the proposal as “not pragmatic or practical,” characterizing it as a distraction from pressing issues ahead of upcoming elections. He asserted that the people would reject the initiative, which he views as a political gimmick.

Congress spokesperson Manickam Tagore predicted that the bill would be defeated in Parliament, echoing sentiments from other opposition parties. The Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) criticized the government for failing to grasp the country’s real priorities, while the Samajwadi Party labeled the administration as “confused” regarding the implementation of ONOP.

In response, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has emphasized the financial benefits of the proposal, arguing that it would significantly reduce election expenditures and simplify logistical operations, which are currently cumbersome and expensive due to India’s diverse political landscape.

Opposition leaders have not held back in their critiques, with Trinamool Congress MP Derek O’Brien dismissing ONOP as a “cheap stunt” from an “anti-democratic” government. This discourse highlights a growing polarization in Indian politics as the proposal garners attention.

The idea of conducting simultaneous elections is not new; it has been discussed since the 1980s. The Justice BP Jeevan Reddy-headed Law Commission suggested in its 1999 report that simultaneous elections could enhance governance and electoral efficiency. Historically, Lok Sabha and state assembly elections were held together in 1951-52, 1957, 1962, and 1967, but this practice was disrupted by early dissolutions of assemblies.

As the political landscape heats up, the ONOP proposal is set to be a focal point of debate in the coming months, with both the ruling party and the opposition preparing for a contentious battle in Parliament.

Will Kejriwal’s Atishi Gamble Pay Off or Misfire?

By
admin
-
0
  • Delhi’s new CM handled more than 13 portfolios including education, finance, planning, PWD, water, power, and public relations in AAP’s Arvind Kejriwal-led Government. Atishi may be a master stroke and the BJP may find it difficult to hit her

Manoj Kumar Pathak

The recent announcement by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal that he will step down from his position has set the stage for a high-stakes political gamble by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). The party’s surprising nomination of Atishi Marlena as the potential successor has created ripples across the political spectrum. This move raises critical questions: Will Atishi Marlena’s appointment be a masterstroke that strengthens AAP’s position, or will it turn out to be a strategic misfire?

The Context of Kejriwal’s Decision

Kejriwal’s decision to step down from the Chief Minister’s position, albeit before the next Delhi Assembly elections scheduled for February 2025, is intriguing. The timing of his announcement, following his release from Tihar Jail, adds layers of complexity to the political calculus. By initiating the process of choosing a successor now, Kejriwal is not only addressing internal party dynamics but also sending a strategic message to his political adversaries.

The choice of Atishi Marlena as the potential next Chief Minister has stirred significant debate. The AAP’s decision to sideline prominent leaders like Rajya Sabha member Sanjay Singh, Delhi’s Minister of Labour and Employment Gopal Rai, and Dalit leader Rakhi Birlan in favor of Marlena is a bold move that could redefine the party’s future trajectory.

Atishi Marlena

Atishi Marlena, an Oxford University graduate, has emerged as a key figure in the Delhi political landscape. Her tenure as an advisor to former Delhi Education Minister Manish Sisodia and her subsequent role overseeing more than 13 portfolios—including education, finance, and public works—highlight her multifaceted capabilities. Her contributions to education, particularly the introduction of the ‘Happiness Curriculum’ and the ‘Entrepreneurship Mindset Curriculum,’ have been well-received.

Marlena’s performance in these roles has garnered praise for her effective governance and innovative approach. Her track record suggests she has the competence and vision to manage Delhi’s complex governance needs. The AAP’s nomination of Marlena reflects a strategic choice aimed at consolidating the party’s position and countering its rivals, particularly the BJP.

The Strategic Implications for AAP

By nominating Marlena, AAP is making a calculated move to position itself favorably in the political landscape. The decision to elevate Marlena, rather than more established party stalwarts, could be seen as a deliberate strategy to project a fresh and reform-oriented image. Marlena’s appointment would likely appeal to voters who are looking for innovative leadership and effective governance.

Furthermore, AAP’s choice to nominate a woman candidate aligns with its broader strategy of emphasizing women-centric policies. The party’s recent budget proposal for the Mukhyamantri Mahila Samman Yojana, which promises financial support to Delhi’s women residents, complements this strategy. If Marlena assumes the Chief Minister’s role, she would be at the forefront of implementing such policies, which could enhance the party’s appeal among female voters.

BJP’s Response

The BJP’s reaction to Marlena’s potential appointment reveals its strategic considerations. The saffron party has framed Marlena’s nomination as a political stunt, a tactic it uses to undermine AAP’s credibility. However, attacking Marlena directly poses significant challenges for the BJP. Unlike other figures in the Delhi government, Marlena has not been embroiled in corruption scandals, which limits the BJP’s opportunities to criticize her effectively.

Moreover, Marlena’s achievements in the education sector, including the successful implementation of progressive educational reforms, make it difficult for the BJP to attack her on grounds of competence. Her background and track record offer the AAP a robust defense against potential criticisms from opposition parties.

The Opposition’s Dilemma

Marlena’s appointment also puts the Congress and other opposition parties in a challenging position. With her reputation for effective governance and her focus on women-centric initiatives, the BJP and Congress will have to carefully navigate their critiques to avoid alienating voters who might support AAP’s reform-oriented agenda.

The BJP, in particular, must balance its criticism of Marlena with the need to avoid appearing overly antagonistic towards a candidate who has not been involved in any significant controversies. This delicate balance could impact the BJP’s ability to mount a cohesive and effective opposition.

Internal Dynamics Within AAP

Internally, AAP’s decision to sideline experienced leaders like Sanjay Singh and Gopal Rai raises questions about the party’s internal dynamics. Singh, Rai, and other potential candidates were seen as capable leaders who could provide stability. The decision to choose Marlena over them might reflect internal strategic calculations, including a desire to present a unified and forward-looking image.

However, this choice could also lead to potential friction within the party. Leaders who were passed over might feel marginalized, which could affect party cohesion and performance in the upcoming elections. Managing these internal dynamics will be crucial for AAP as it navigates the political landscape leading up to the elections.

AAP’s gamble on Marlena can be seen as part of a broader strategic vision to consolidate its position in Delhi and beyond. By promoting a candidate with a strong background in governance and reform, AAP aims to reinforce its image as a progressive and effective party. This move could also be intended to appeal to a wider electorate, including younger voters and those interested in innovative governance solutions.

The party’s emphasis on women-centric policies and Marlena’s role in implementing these policies is a deliberate effort to resonate with voters concerned about gender equity and social justice. This approach could enhance AAP’s electoral prospects and provide a counter-narrative to criticisms from opposition parties.

A Risk Worth Taking?

Arvind Kejriwal’s decision to nominate Atishi Marlena as the next potential Chief Minister of Delhi is a bold and strategic move. The gamble could pay off if Marlena’s proven track record in governance and her alignment with the party’s progressive agenda resonate with voters. Her appointment represents a strategic maneuver to project a fresh and dynamic image while addressing internal and external political challenges.

However, the success of this gamble will depend on several factors, including Marlena’s ability to navigate the complex political terrain, manage internal party dynamics, and effectively counter opposition criticisms. As the Delhi Assembly elections approach, the impact of this decision will become clearer, revealing whether Kejriwal’s gamble with Marlena proves to be a masterstroke or a misstep in the ever-evolving political landscape of Delhi.

Raghubar’s Bid for Jharkhand: old rival Saryu stands in way

By
admin
-
0

  • Ex-CM Das, who is now Odisha Governor, had lost to Rai from Jamshedpur East in last state election, both leaders are now said to be eyeing the seat again amid talks of BJP-JD(U) tie-up

Anant Tiwari

As Jharkhand prepares for its upcoming assembly elections later this year, the political arena is abuzz with a high-stakes contest in the Jamshedpur East constituency. The key players in this gripping electoral drama are two seasoned politicians: former Chief Minister Raghubar Das and the incumbent MLA Saryu Rai. Das, a prominent BJP leader and the former Chief Minister of Jharkhand, is seeking to reclaim his former seat after a tumultuous political journey. Rai, a notable figure in Jharkhand politics who defeated Das in the last election, is now positioned as a formidable candidate under the JD(U) banner. The unfolding battle in Jamshedpur East highlights broader political dynamics and potential alliances that could shape the future of Jharkhand’s governance.

Raghubar Das: A Return to Roots

Raghubar Das, who served as Jharkhand’s Chief Minister from 2014 to 2019, is a significant figure in the state’s political landscape. Das’s tenure was marked by ambitious developmental projects and attempts to modernize the state. However, his administration faced several challenges, notably among the tribal communities. The government’s failed attempts to amend the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act and the Santhal Parganas Tenancy Act—legislation designed to protect tribal land rights—alienated these communities. This alienation was a key factor in the BJP’s defeat in the 2019 assembly elections, where the party struggled to secure seats reserved for tribal populations.

In 2023, Das was appointed Odisha Governor, a role he assumed with some reluctance, given his ongoing attachment to Jharkhand politics. Despite the prestigious position, Das’s heart appears to remain in Jharkhand. His decision to return to state politics and contest from Jamshedpur East reflects his ambition to re-establish himself as a key player in Jharkhand’s political arena.

Das’s frequent visits to Jamshedpur, where he has engaged in various religious and social activities, underscore his strategy to reconnect with his former constituency. Participating in local events such as the Surya Mandir’s Jalabhishek Yatra, Janmashtami celebrations, and Ganesh Puja, Das aims to rekindle his rapport with the electorate and present himself as a dedicated public servant who remains closely tied to the community he once served.

Saryu Rai: The Incumbent’s Challenge

Saryu Rai, who emerged as a significant challenger in the 2019 elections, currently holds the position of MLA for Jamshedpur East. Rai’s victory over Das in the previous election was a notable upset, showcasing his growing influence and the shifting political sentiments in the region. His candidacy as an independent, which resulted in a surprising win against the sitting Chief Minister, highlighted his ability to connect with voters and capitalize on public dissatisfaction with the then-incumbent administration.

Rai’s recent move to join the Janata Dal (United) or JD(U) adds another layer of complexity to the electoral dynamics. His alignment with JD(U), a party with significant clout in Bihar and a growing presence in Jharkhand, positions him as a key player in the upcoming election. Rai’s affiliation with JD(U) reflects his strategic maneuvering to consolidate support and leverage the party’s resources and network.

The JD(U) is keen to expand its influence beyond Bihar, and Jharkhand is a critical battleground for the party. Rai’s bid to contest Jamshedpur East on the JD(U) ticket underscores the party’s strategy to penetrate new territories and challenge the dominance of regional players like the BJP. His tenure as MLA and his reputation for exposing corruption make him a formidable opponent for Das.

The BJP-JD(U) Alliance: Navigating Complex Alliances

The BJP faces a delicate balancing act as it navigates its potential alliance with JD(U) for the Jharkhand elections. Both parties are part of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) at the national level, but their cooperation in Jharkhand presents challenges due to competing interests and strategic considerations. The BJP’s internal discussions have reportedly included high-level meetings with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah, exploring ways to manage the conflicting ambitions of Das and Rai.

The potential alliance between BJP and JD(U) is fraught with difficulties. The JD(U) is seeking a significant share of seats in Jharkhand, and Jamshedpur East is a crucial constituency for them. The BJP must navigate this complex situation while addressing Das’s desire to return to Jharkhand politics and manage the expectations of its ally. The party’s internal dynamics and strategic decisions will play a crucial role in determining the outcome of this electoral contest.

The Political Landscape: Voter Demographics and Issues

Jharkhand’s political landscape is characterized by its diverse demographics and complex electoral dynamics. The state’s electorate includes a substantial portion of tribal and OBC voters, whose support is essential for any party seeking electoral success. Das’s administration faced significant challenges in addressing the needs and concerns of these communities, which contributed to the BJP’s electoral setback in 2019.

In the upcoming elections, the BJP is working to regain tribal support, which is critical for its prospects. The party has made strategic moves to involve influential tribal leaders such as Champai Soren and former minister Sudarshan Bhagat. Additionally, the BJP has sought to consolidate support from the Kolhan region and other tribal-dominated areas. However, the challenge of winning back tribal trust remains substantial, and the party’s efforts to address this issue will be closely scrutinized.

Saryu Rai’s current status as the sitting MLA gives him an advantage, as he has established himself as a key figure in Jamshedpur East. His previous role in exposing corruption and his alignment with JD(U) enhance his credibility and position him as a strong candidate in the upcoming election.

Internal BJP Dynamics: Leadership and Strategy

Within the BJP, there is some resistance to Das’s return to state politics. Critics argue that reintroducing Das into Jharkhand’s political scene could create confusion and disrupt the party’s current strategy, which has focused on building leadership from within the state. The appointment of Babulal Marandi as state BJP chief and the involvement of other prominent leaders suggest a strategic shift away from relying on Das.

There is also speculation about potential alternative candidates if Das is not permitted to return to Jharkhand politics. Some insiders suggest that Das’s family members, particularly his daughter-in-law, could be considered as candidates for Jamshedpur East. This potential move highlights the intricate interplay of personal and political considerations within the BJP.

The Saryu Rai Hurdle: Historical Context and Future Prospects

The relationship between Raghubar Das and Saryu Rai has been marked by tension and rivalry. In 2019, Das’s decision to deny Rai a ticket for Jamshedpur West led to Rai’s revolt and subsequent victory in Jamshedpur East as an independent. Rai’s reputation as a whistleblower on corruption scandals, including the fodder scam and the coal mining scam, has solidified his position as a principled and influential politician.

Rai’s alignment with JD(U) and his continued focus on issues such as corruption and governance will be central to his campaign. The JD(U)’s support and resources will bolster Rai’s efforts and provide a strong counterweight to Das’s ambitions.

A Battle of Titans in Jamshedpur East

The electoral contest in Jamshedpur East promises to be a high-octane affair, with Raghubar Das and Saryu Rai emerging as key figures in this critical battleground. Das’s return to Jharkhand politics and Rai’s strong position as the incumbent MLA create a dynamic and competitive environment. The BJP’s potential alliance with JD(U) and the party’s internal dynamics will play a crucial role in shaping the outcome of this election.

As the election approaches, the strategies and maneuvers of Das, Rai, and their respective parties will be pivotal in determining the future political landscape of Jharkhand. The contest in Jamshedpur East is not merely a clash of personalities but a reflection of broader political shifts and alliances that will have significant implications for the state’s governance and party dynamics in the years to come. The resolution of this high-stakes electoral battle will set the stage for the future trajectory of Jharkhand’s political landscape.

Haryana Dangal : Congress’ Vinesh Phogat Faces Tough Challenges in Julana

By
admin
-
0

Shailendra Gautam

The political arena in Haryana has come alive with the latest electoral contest: the battle for the Julana assembly constituency. In a dramatic twist, the Congress party has fielded Vinesh Phogat, an Olympian wrestler whose political debut is as intense as her athletic career. This high-stakes contest pits Phogat against a formidable lineup of candidates, with the BJP’s Captain Yogesh Bairagi emerging as a significant contender.

Vinesh Phogat’s entry into the political arena is nothing short of compelling. Known for her prowess on the wrestling mat, Phogat’s career took an unexpected turn when she was disqualified from the Paris 2024 Olympics due to being overweight by just 100 grams in the 50 kg weight category. This disqualification, while a setback in her sporting career, has propelled her into the political spotlight as she seeks to make her mark in Julana.

Her political debut is akin to her Olympic bouts—high-stakes and closely scrutinized. The Congress party, recognizing her popularity and the potential to sway the Jat vote, has chosen Phogat to contest from Julana. This constituency, located in Haryana’s Jat-dominated Bangar region, has historically been a stronghold for regional parties like the Indian National Lok Dal (INLD) and the Jannayak Janta Party (JJP).

The Political Maths of Julana

Julana’s political landscape is complex and competitive. The constituency has been dominated by regional players over the past 15 years. INLD’s Parminder Singh won the seat in 2009 and 2014, while JJP’s Amarjeet Dhanda took the seat in 2019. The Congress, which held the seat from 2000 to 2009 through Sher Singh, has struggled to reclaim it since then. The historical dominance of regional parties, coupled with their entrenched support bases, presents a significant challenge for Phogat.

The Jat community, which constitutes 22-27% of Haryana’s population, plays a crucial role in this constituency. The Congress is hoping that Phogat’s popularity among Jats, farmers, women, and youth will give them an edge. Phogat’s personal connection to the region—her husband’s family hails from Bakhta Khera village, which falls within Julana—adds a local touch to her campaign.

However, the political battle is far from straightforward. Phogat faces stiff competition from BJP’s Captain Yogesh Bairagi, a prominent youth leader and the current vice president of the BJP’s Haryana youth wing. Bairagi’s background as a professional pilot and his active role in the BJP’s sports cell position him as a formidable opponent.

The Jat Vote and Political Dynamics

The Jat vote is a critical factor in Haryana politics. The community’s influence extends to 37 seats in Haryana where they make up more than 20% of the electorate. This includes a significant concentration in the Rohtak and Hisar divisions. In the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, the Jat community predominantly supported the Congress-AAP alliance, with 64% backing the alliance compared to 27% for the BJP. This shift reflects growing discontent with the BJP among Jat voters, who have been vocal in their opposition to the party’s policies and handling of issues affecting their community.

The BJP has historically struggled to gain substantial support from Jats, with notable exceptions such as the period following the Balakot airstrikes in 2019. However, the party’s recent performance has been hampered by farmer protests, wrestlers’ demonstrations, and controversies surrounding the Agniveer scheme. The BJP’s failure to address the grievances of the Jat community has opened a window for the Congress to capitalize on this discontent.

Vinesh Phogat vs. Kavita Dalal: A Competing Narrative

Phogat’s primary rival in Julana is Kavita Dalal of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), a renowned professional wrestler and the first Indian woman to compete in WWE. Dalal presents herself as a local hero, emphasizing her long-standing connection to the area and her preparation for the assembly elections since 2022. Dalal’s campaign leverages her status as ‘Julana ki Beti’ (daughter of Julana) and her local roots, contrasting sharply with Phogat’s relatively recent entry into the constituency.

Dalal has accused Phogat of being an “outsider” who is exploiting the wrestlers’ protest for political gain. She argues that while Phogat is a celebrated athlete, her involvement in politics is a recent development and questions why Phogat’s fellow wrestlers are not actively participating in her campaign. This counter-narrative aims to challenge Phogat’s authenticity and undermine her appeal.

The Julana constituency, with its 1.85 lakh voters, faces several pressing issues, including inadequate infrastructure, a shortage of teachers and doctors, and high unemployment. The electorate includes a diverse mix: 40% Jats, 40,000 Scheduled Castes (SC), 33,000 Backward Classes (BC), and 22,000 Brahmins. Addressing these issues is crucial for any candidate seeking electoral success.

Phogat’s campaign will need to navigate these local concerns while leveraging her national profile and personal connections to the area. Her appeal as a symbol of perseverance and achievement, especially among women, could be a significant asset. Her role in last year’s wrestlers’ protest and her advocacy for athletes’ rights could resonate with voters who are concerned about gender issues and sports development.

On the other hand, Captain Yogesh Bairagi, with his background in aviation and active involvement in BJP’s youth wing, brings a different set of strengths to the table. His ability to connect with younger voters and his demonstrated leadership within the BJP could play a pivotal role in swaying undecided voters.

A Thrilling Contest Ahead

The battle for Julana is shaping up to be a thrilling and highly competitive contest. With Vinesh Phogat, Kavita Dalal, and Captain Yogesh Bairagi as the main contenders, each brings unique attributes and narratives to the race. Phogat’s wrestling fame and local ties, Dalal’s established presence and local roots, and Bairagi’s youth appeal and party affiliation create a dynamic electoral scenario.

As the election draws closer, the outcome will depend on how effectively each candidate addresses local issues, connects with voters, and leverages their personal and political strengths. The Congress party’s bet on Phogat could potentially shift the balance if she can translate her athletic achievements into political success. Conversely, Dalal’s and Bairagi’s strategies will need to resonate with voters to counter Phogat’s appeal.

The Julana assembly election is more than just a local contest; it reflects broader trends and issues that are shaping Haryana’s political landscape. The results will not only determine the future of the constituency but also offer insights into the shifting dynamics of Haryana politics and the national political climate.

A Knife’s Edge Contest Between Trump and Kamala

By
admin
-
0

Padma Dubey Malviya

As the 2024 U.S. presidential race approaches its climax, the contest between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris is shaping up to be one of the most dramatic and closely watched elections in recent history. The stakes are exceptionally high, with the race poised on a knife’s edge, reflecting a nation deeply divided and profoundly engaged in the electoral process.

The recent security incidents involving Donald Trump have added an unexpected layer of drama to the campaign. In July, Trump narrowly escaped an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania, where a gunman’s bullet grazed his ear. More recently, a man armed with a rifle was apprehended at a golf club where Trump was present, highlighting ongoing security concerns surrounding the former president. While such dramatic events might garner sympathy and rally some voters to Trump’s cause, the actual impact on the election remains to be seen.

These incidents could potentially increase Trump’s visibility and generate a sympathetic voter base. However, the ultimate effect on the electorate’s decision-making is uncertain. The race remains incredibly tight, with polls showing Harris ahead by a slim margin. This thin lead underscores the precarious nature of the election and the potential for dramatic shifts in voter sentiment as November 5 approaches.

Current polling data indicates a razor-thin margin between Trump and Harris, with the Vice President holding a slight edge of about three percentage points—49% to Trump’s 46%. This margin is within the range of statistical error, meaning that the election could still swing in either direction. Analysts caution against drawing definitive conclusions based on these numbers alone, as the fluctuating nature of the campaign and potential unforeseen events could alter the trajectory of the race significantly.

In addition to the tight polling, historical trends suggest that higher voter turnout generally benefits Democrats. The 2022 mid-term elections saw increased Democratic participation following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, which galvanized Democratic voters and led to a significant impact on election outcomes. A similar pattern could emerge in 2024, with Democratic turnout potentially bolstered by key issues and heightened voter engagement.

Key Issues and Policy Debates

One of the central issues in the 2024 presidential race is immigration policy, a topic that has long been contentious in American politics. Trump’s immigration stance, marked by controversial policies such as the “Muslim ban” and harsh rhetoric towards Latin American immigrants, has continued to polarize voters. His inflammatory remarks during the first presidential debate, including unfounded allegations about immigrants, are likely to resonate with some voters while alienating others.

The Trump administration’s previous policies on immigration have already faced significant criticism, and Trump’s continued focus on nativist rhetoric may further alienate moderate and undecided voters. On the other hand, Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party face the challenge of presenting a coherent and humane immigration policy. The need for a rational and just approach to border control and asylum, including pathways to citizenship for undocumented workers who contribute positively to American society, is a key issue that Harris must address.

The immigration debate is not just a policy issue but also a reflection of broader societal divisions. The contrasting approaches of Trump and Harris on this front highlight the deep polarization in American politics and underscore the need for constructive and bipartisan solutions.

The Influence of Evangelical Christians

White evangelical Christians have been a crucial demographic for Trump, providing significant support in past elections. However, recent opinion polls show that Trump and Harris are now nearly tied in this voter bloc. This shift raises important questions about the future of Trump’s relationship with the religious right and the impact of his presidency on evangelical voters.

Trump’s appeal to evangelicals has been a notable aspect of his political career, despite his personal history of multiple marriages and allegations of sexual misconduct. His ability to maintain support from this key demographic, despite ongoing controversies and legal issues, is a testament to his complex and often contradictory political persona. The evolving dynamics of Trump’s relationship with evangelical voters will be an important factor in the 2024 race.

Legal Troubles and Personal Controversies

Trump’s legal challenges add another layer of complexity to his candidacy. Last month, he was convicted on 34 felony counts related to hush-money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels. Additionally, Trump was found liable for sexual abuse in a case involving a woman from 1996. These legal issues have not only impacted Trump’s public image but also raised questions about his suitability for the presidency.

The impact of Trump’s legal troubles on his campaign is multifaceted. On one hand, these controversies could erode his support among voters who prioritize integrity and ethical conduct. On the other hand, Trump’s ability to frame these issues as politically motivated attacks could resonate with his base, potentially solidifying their support. The interplay between these factors will be crucial in determining the overall impact of Trump’s legal issues on the election.

The Need for Bipartisan Solutions

The current political climate underscores the need for bipartisan approaches to the country’s challenges. As the presidential race continues, it is evident that both candidates must navigate a complex and polarized electoral landscape. The issues at stake, including immigration, healthcare, and economic policy, require thoughtful and pragmatic solutions that transcend partisan divides.

A focus on bipartisan politics and policy is essential for addressing the pressing issues facing the nation. Both Trump and Harris will need to demonstrate their ability to engage with a diverse electorate and offer practical solutions that address the concerns of all Americans. The need for constructive dialogue and collaboration is more pressing than ever, given the deep divisions and heightened tensions in American politics.

The U.S. presidential race is poised on a knife’s edge, with Trump and Harris locked in a closely contested battle. The dramatic events of recent weeks, combined with ongoing controversies and the potential for unexpected developments, make this election one of the most unpredictable in recent memory. As the campaign progresses, both candidates will need to navigate a challenging landscape and address a wide range of issues to secure victory.

The outcome of the 2024 election will have profound implications for the future of American politics and governance. The tight race, coupled with the dramatic and polarizing nature of the campaign, highlights the need for voters to carefully consider the candidates’ policies, track records, and vision for the country. As November 5 approaches, the focus will be on how both candidates address the pressing issues of the day and engage with the electorate to win their support.

The U.S. presidential race between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris is a high-stakes contest characterized by dramatic developments, contentious issues, and a deeply divided electorate. The outcome remains uncertain, and the path to victory for both candidates will involve navigating a complex and fluid political landscape. As the election draws closer, the nation watches with anticipation, aware that the results will shape the future direction of American politics for years to come.

Expanding Ayushman Bharat: Challenges in Elderly Care

By
admin
-
0

Tauqeer Khan

India is at a critical juncture in its healthcare journey. The expansion of the Ayushman Bharat health insurance scheme to cover all senior citizens above 70 years, regardless of income status, represents a promising shift in how the country addresses the needs of its elderly population. However, the effectiveness of this policy change hinges on a deeper engagement with the underlying issues in India’s healthcare infrastructure. As India’s elderly population grows, this expansion must be carefully managed to ensure that it translates into real, high-quality care for senior citizens.

The Current Landscape of Elderly Care in India

The demographic profile of India is undergoing a dramatic transformation. By 2050, it is projected that the elderly population will double, reaching approximately 320 million and comprising nearly 20% of the total population. This shift will have profound implications not only for the healthcare system but for societal structures as a whole. The elderly, often requiring long-term care for chronic conditions such as diabetes, arthritis, and heart disease, will demand increased healthcare resources and specialized services.

Unfortunately, India’s healthcare infrastructure is currently not well-equipped to meet these rising demands. Presently, India’s expenditure on healthcare stands at just over 1.17% of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP)—a figure that is among the lowest globally. This limited funding has resulted in significant gaps in healthcare services, particularly in rural and semi-urban areas where access to care is already restricted.

The Expansion of Ayushman Bharat: Opportunities and Risks

The Ayushman Bharat scheme, which aims to provide health insurance coverage to the economically vulnerable segments of society, has already made substantial strides since its inception. The recent decision to expand the scheme to include all senior citizens above 70 years, regardless of their income status, is a commendable move. It reflects an understanding of the unique challenges faced by the elderly and acknowledges the need for a more inclusive approach to healthcare.

However, this expansion presents several challenges that must be addressed to ensure its success. One of the primary concerns is the risk of substandard care resulting from insufficient funding. The expansion of the scheme without a corresponding increase in public healthcare expenditure could lead to cost-cutting measures at the State level. This scenario might result in poor quality of care, particularly in economically weaker regions where healthcare resources are already stretched thin.

The Risk of Regional Disparities

India’s diverse socio-economic landscape means that the impact of the Ayushman Bharat expansion will not be uniform across the country. Wealthier States may have the resources and infrastructure to manage the increased demand effectively, while poorer States could struggle with disparities in healthcare quality and accessibility. This uneven distribution of resources could exacerbate existing regional inequalities and undermine the objective of providing equitable care to all senior citizens.

A recent report by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) highlighted several issues with the implementation of the Ayushman Bharat scheme. The report revealed instances of widespread corruption and non-compliance with prescribed standards by empanelled hospitals. Such discrepancies not only impact the quality of care but also erode public trust in the scheme. The lack of adequate empanelled hospitals to meet growing needs further complicates the situation, leading to delays and reduced access to care.

The Gap in Geriatric Care Infrastructure

One of the most pressing issues in India’s healthcare system is the lack of specialized geriatric care. According to a 2021 report from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, only 0.2% of hospitals in India have dedicated geriatric care units. This stark inadequacy highlights a significant gap in the healthcare system, particularly given the increasing need for specialized care for elderly patients.

The absence of geriatric care units is compounded by the fact that many medical colleges in India do not offer specialized training in geriatrics. This lack of training means that there is a shortage of healthcare professionals with the expertise needed to provide high-quality care for the elderly. The growing demand for geriatric care must be matched with a corresponding increase in the number of trained professionals and specialized facilities to ensure that the expanded insurance coverage translates into effective and comprehensive care.

Addressing Outpatient Care Needs

Another critical aspect of elderly care that is currently overlooked by the Ayushman Bharat scheme is outpatient care. While the scheme provides coverage for inpatient services, it does not extend to outpatient care. This is a significant gap, given that 40-80% of health expenditure in India is on outpatient services. Many elderly individuals require regular outpatient visits for chronic conditions, follow-up treatments, and preventive care. The exclusion of outpatient services from the scheme could leave a substantial portion of elderly patients without necessary care and exacerbate their health issues over time.

The Role of Traditional Support Systems

In addition to addressing gaps in healthcare infrastructure, it is crucial to recognize the role of traditional support systems. Historically, extended families have played a significant role in providing care for the elderly. However, the rise of nuclear families and the weakening of traditional support systems over recent decades have left many elderly individuals without adequate care. This shift underscores the need for a robust, formalized healthcare system that can step in to fill the void left by these changing family structures.

Recommendations for a Sustainable Approach

To address these challenges and ensure that the expanded Ayushman Bharat scheme provides effective care for the elderly, several key actions are needed:

  • Increase Public Healthcare Funding : To support the expanded coverage and improve the quality of care, there must be a significant increase in public healthcare expenditure. This funding should be targeted at both improving existing infrastructure and developing new facilities, particularly in underserved areas.
  • Develop Specialized Geriatric Care Units : Investing in specialized geriatric care units and training programs for healthcare professionals is essential. This investment will help bridge the current gap in geriatric care and ensure that elderly patients receive the expertise and attention they need.
  • Expand Outpatient Coverage : The Ayushman Bharat scheme should be expanded to include outpatient care services. This inclusion will address a significant portion of healthcare needs for the elderly and provide a more comprehensive coverage package.
  • Strengthen Implementation and Oversight : To address issues of corruption and non-compliance, there must be strengthened oversight mechanisms for the implementation of the scheme. Ensuring that empanelled hospitals adhere to prescribed standards is critical to maintaining the quality of care.
  • Focus on Regional Equity : Special attention should be given to addressing regional disparities in healthcare quality and accessibility. This includes allocating additional resources to economically weaker States and ensuring that they are equipped to manage the increased demand for care.
  • Enhance Community-Based Support Systems : Developing community-based support systems and integrating them with formal healthcare services can help fill gaps left by traditional family structures. Community health workers and local support networks can play a vital role in providing care and support to elderly individuals.

The expansion of the Ayushman Bharat scheme to cover all senior citizens above 70 years is a significant and positive step towards improving healthcare access for the elderly. However, to realize the full potential of this initiative, it is crucial to address the broader systemic issues within India’s healthcare infrastructure. By increasing funding, investing in specialized care, expanding coverage, and strengthening oversight, India can ensure that its elderly population receives the high-quality care they deserve. As the country navigates this demographic transition, a holistic and well-resourced approach to elderly care will be essential in providing equitable and effective healthcare services to all senior citizens.

Haryana : Caste Alliances Crumble, BJP Struggles as Leaders Abandon Ship

By
admin
-
0

Disillusionment with the BJP is evident particularly in cities along the G.T. Road belt like Panipat, Sonipat, Karnal and Ambala

Shailendra Gautam

Chandigarh : The political landscape in Haryana is undergoing a seismic shift, as the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) grapples with a wave of discontent and defections. On September 8, G.L. Sharma, the vice-president of the Haryana BJP, announced his resignation, a move that was soon followed by over 250 other officials who switched allegiance to the Congress. This exodus marks the fifth consecutive day of mass resignations from the BJP, which have included state cabinet ministers, sitting MLAs, and influential leaders at both state and district levels.

The catalyst for this upheaval was the BJP’s release of its first list of 67 candidates for the upcoming Assembly elections on September 4. The announcement sparked internal revolts within the party, highlighting deep-seated dissatisfaction with party leadership and growing concerns about the BJP’s electoral prospects. However, the unrest within the party had been brewing long before the release of this list, driven by a series of grievances regarding the party’s leadership and its apparent faltering momentum.

Historically, the BJP has struggled to establish a dominant presence in Haryana. In the state’s inaugural Assembly election of 1967, the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, the BJP’s predecessor, secured only 12 out of 81 seats. As Haryana’s farming community gained influence, the BJP’s seat count generally remained in single digits, with occasional alliances formed to consolidate opposition votes. It was not until the 2014 elections that the BJP made a notable breakthrough, riding the so-called ‘Modi wave’ and forming what was termed an anti-Jat alliance at the state level.

This strategy aimed to unite Banias, Punjabis, and backward castes to counterbalance the Jat population, which the BJP perceived as a major voting bloc. Despite initial success, this alliance strategy had its limitations in Haryana’s closely-knit society. Traditionally, the Dalit and backward communities in Haryana had been aligned with the Congress, which had managed to build a broad-based coalition over time. The BJP’s attempts to break into this voter base through defections and alliances had limited success, even though it did manage to attract some prominent figures like Rao Indrajit Singh to win over Ahir voters.

The 2014 Assembly elections saw the BJP narrowly securing a majority, largely due to a combination of anti-incumbency sentiment against the Congress, which had been in power for a decade, and the absence of prominent opposition leader Om Prakash Chautala, who was jailed over a recruitment scam. The BJP capitalized on these circumstances, but the subsequent 2019 Assembly elections presented new challenges. Om Prakash Chautala’s grandson, Dushyant Chautala, launched the Jannayak Janata Party (JJP), which split the anti-BJP vote and led to a hung assembly. The BJP’s response was to employ ‘Operation Kamal’, offering Chautala the deputy chief minister position to secure a coalition government.

The next five years under the BJP’s rule were marked by significant challenges, including the COVID-19 pandemic and widespread farmers’ protests. The BJP’s handling of the farmers’ protests, which involved barricading Delhi’s borders and confronting the protestors, alienated not only the Jats but also other farming communities. This created a hostile environment for BJP leaders, who faced difficulties in holding public meetings or participating in events due to widespread farmer opposition.

As the 2024 Lok Sabha elections approached, the BJP attempted to address the growing discontent by replacing Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar with Nayab Singh Saini, an OBC leader, in a bid to counter anti-incumbency and appeal to the Other Backward Classes (OBCs). Despite this strategy, the Lok Sabha results indicated that the party’s efforts were not successful in shifting voter sentiment.

Disillusionment with the BJP is particularly pronounced in cities along the G.T. Road belt, including Panipat, Sonipat, Karnal, and Ambala. These urban centers, once considered strongholds of BJP support, are witnessing a shift in loyalties. Reports suggest that the BJP is struggling to maintain its base among city dwellers and traditional supporters from the Punjabi and Vaish communities, who were once crucial to its electoral success.

The BJP’s carefully constructed caste-based alliances have begun to unravel, exposing the party to a more volatile political landscape. The erosion of these alliances has significantly undermined the BJP’s influence in Haryana, leaving it in a precarious position as it attempts to regain the trust of communities that once played a pivotal role in its success.

In this tumultuous environment, individual political careers are also in flux. For instance, Vinesh Phogat, a prominent wrestler, is contesting the upcoming Assembly elections from the Julana seat on a Congress ticket. Her candidacy has drawn attention not only because of her popularity but also due to the political maneuvering involved. Phogat faced challenges with her resignation from Indian Railways, which initially delayed her ability to contest. However, the urgency of her candidacy and the broader political implications likely influenced the swift resolution of her resignation process.

Similarly, Sunil Sangwan, an ex-jailor who received a BJP ticket for the Dadri constituency, opted for voluntary retirement from his position as Bhondsi Jail superintendent. This move, expedited under political pressure, reflects the complexities and strategic maneuvers often involved in the political sphere.

As Haryana navigates this period of political upheaval, the BJP’s struggle to maintain its foothold in the state serves as a reflection of broader challenges facing the party. The crumbling of caste alliances and the wave of defections highlight the difficulties the BJP faces in adapting to changing political dynamics and voter sentiment. The coming months will be crucial in determining whether the BJP can regain its footing or if the growing discontent will reshape Haryana’s political landscape.

Jharkhand: Pre-Poll Hysteria Over ‘Love and Land Jihad’

By
admin
-
0

  • Mineral rich state’s political scene is currently marked by high stakes and intense rhetoric
  • Thousands of Bangladeshi Muslims, Amit Shah claimed in July, had infiltrated Santhal Pargana, married Adivasi women and occupied land

Anant Tiwari

Ranchi : As Jharkhand braces for its Assembly elections at the end of December, a dramatic and contentious narrative has emerged, largely fueled by political actors from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). At the heart of this controversy is the claim that thousands of Bangladeshi Muslims have infiltrated the Santhal Pargana region, married Adivasi women, and occupied tribal lands. This accusation, made by Union Home Minister Amit Shah in July, has sparked significant debate and agitation within the state. However, the veracity of these claims remains highly questionable.

Political Rhetoric and Allegations

In July, Amit Shah alleged that Santhal Pargana, a region in Jharkhand, had seen an influx of Bangladeshi Muslims who, according to him, had married Adivasi women and encroached upon tribal land. This assertion has been echoed by several prominent BJP leaders, including MP Nishikant Dubey, former Chief Ministers Babulal Marandi and Champai Soren, and Asha Lakra from the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST). The BJP’s aggressive campaign has framed these events under the banner of ‘love and land jihad,’ attempting to paint a picture of systematic demographic and territorial invasion.

Despite these sensational claims, the Government of India has consistently maintained that there is no concrete data on undocumented Bangladeshis residing in India. In fact, the Supreme Court was informed that it is impossible to accurately quantify the number of such individuals. This lack of evidence casts doubt on the BJP’s narrative, which continues to gain traction through relentless media propagation.

Ground Reality of Land Alienation

Jharkhand has long faced challenges related to land alienation, particularly affecting its Adivasi communities. The Chotanagpur Tenancy (CNT) Act of 1908 and the Santhal Pargana Tenancy (SPT) Act of 1949 were enacted to safeguard tribal land from being transferred to non-tribals. Despite these legal protections, large tracts of Adivasi land have been taken without proper consent. The actual perpetrators of this land alienation are not foreign infiltrators but rather a complex interplay of state actors and industrial interests.

Corruption, coercion, forgery, and manipulation of land records are common methods through which tribal land has been appropriated. Issues such as dubious ‘deeds of donation’ and informal transactions further complicate the situation. The BJP’s focus on alleged Bangladeshi infiltration diverts attention from these more pressing and concrete issues of land rights and corruption.

Scrutiny of the ‘Love Jihad’ Claims

The BJP’s narrative of ‘love jihad’ has been scrutinized and found wanting. Asha Lakra, a key figure in propagating these claims, mentioned specific instances of Adivasi women being married to Bangladeshi infiltrators. However, these claims have been debunked. Investigations reveal that some of the women cited had married Adivasi men, while others had married local Hindus. The so-called ‘evidence’ of forced marriages involving Muslims was largely fabricated or taken out of context.
A field survey conducted by the Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha and the Loktantra Bachao Abhiyan in Sahibganj also contradicted the BJP’s narrative. The survey found no evidence of Bangladeshi infiltrators and confirmed that local couples, including those married to Muslims, had not been coerced. Instead, the survey highlighted widespread violations of the SPT Act and noted that police harassment was a more pressing issue.
Jharkhand Chief Minister Hemant Soren has dismissed the allegations of ‘love jihad’ as baseless. He points out that Jharkhand does not share an international border with Bangladesh, which raises questions about the logistics of any alleged infiltration. Despite this, BJP leaders Babulal Marandi and Champai Soren have continued to support and amplify these claims, contributing to an increasingly heated pre-election atmosphere.

Internal BJP Dynamics and Political Maneuvering

The BJP’s pre-election strategy has involved significant political maneuvering. Champai Soren, who briefly served as Chief Minister after Hemant Soren’s arrest on June 28, was not welcomed back by Soren upon his release. This incident, combined with the government’s recent controversial legislation, triggered a political crisis. Champai Soren’s alleged attempt to switch allegiance to the BJP was seen as a major threat to Hemant Soren’s leadership.

Faced with this challenge, Hemant Soren swiftly acted to counter the potential defection. He instructed Champai Soren to resign from his post, a move that was seen as both a tactical and symbolic gesture to solidify his own position. Champai Soren’s subsequent decision to join the BJP, motivated by personal and political grievances, was intended to bolster the BJP’s prospects in Jharkhand.

Impact of Champai Soren’s Defection

Champai Soren’s switch to the BJP was expected to be a game-changer, potentially enhancing the party’s position in the Kolhan region, which had been a stronghold for the JMM. However, the impact has been underwhelming. The BJP’s efforts to leverage Soren’s defection have not translated into significant political gains. Despite hopes of capturing 8-9 seats in the Kolhan region, the BJP has struggled to make inroads. Soren’s defection has not led to a mass exodus of JMM legislators, and the BJP’s performance in the region remains lackluster.

The Kolhan region, which elects 14 MLAs to the state assembly, saw the JMM win 12 seats in the last election. Champai Soren’s previous defeat in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, where he lost to the BJP by a substantial margin, further underscores the limited impact of his political switch. The BJP’s struggles in the region are compounded by internal dissent and the presence of formidable local leaders like Arjun Munda and Raghubar Das.

The Broader Political Scenario

The BJP’s pre-poll campaign in Jharkhand reflects broader national trends, where the party has employed polarizing strategies to galvanize support. The ‘love jihad’ narrative, while controversial, is part of a larger strategy to mobilize certain voter bases by stoking fears and uncertainties. However, this approach has faced significant pushback from local communities and political analysts who question the legitimacy of these claims.


As Jharkhand heads towards its Assembly elections, the focus on ‘love jihad’ and land issues illustrates the volatile and contentious nature of the state’s political landscape. With both the BJP and opposition parties engaging in strategic maneuvering, the elections are shaping up to be a fiercely contested battle. The BJP’s attempt to leverage sensational allegations and internal defections highlights the party’s desperation to shift the electoral dynamics in its favor.


Jharkhand’s political scene is currently marked by high stakes and intense rhetoric. The BJP’s allegations of ‘love jihad’ and land invasion, while generating considerable media attention, lack substantiation and divert focus from the real issues affecting the state’s Adivasi communities. The unfolding political drama, including Champai Soren’s defection and the BJP’s strategic maneuvering, underscores the complexity of Jharkhand’s electoral politics.


As the state prepares for its Assembly elections, the implications of these developments will be closely watched. The ability of the BJP and other parties to navigate the shifting political landscape will be crucial in determining the outcome of the elections and the future trajectory of Jharkhand’s governance.

123...232Page 2 of 232

EDITOR PICKS

POPULAR POSTS

POPULAR CATEGORY

ABOUT US

The Emerging World is an English daily Broadsheet newspaper published from national capital Delhi and Palamu in Jharkhand. Established in 2011, the newspaper has gained a widespread readership owing to its high-quality reporting and engaging content.

Contact us: theemergingworld@gmail.com

FOLLOW US

© The Emerging World, All rights reserved. - by www.bininfotech.com